Loading Larkspur’s toy experts model…
Larkspur’s toy runs 2 of 8 rooms a floor; DeepSeek-V3 runs 8 plus 1 shared of 256 per layer.
Chapter 7 of 7
Workbench: a shape for the server
Larkspur’s server has a memory budget and a speed budget. The team has 4 published model cards to choose from.
This chapter: Which model and precision fit both budgets with the most weights?
About this chapter
You will learn
- Check total weights against memory
- Check active weights against the work per token
- Why precision helps memory, not work
Words you’ll meet
- Budget
- A limit Larkspur sets: memory for weights, and weights at work per token. Planning numbers.
- Precision
- Bits per weight. Fewer bits shrink memory (Inference’s quantization); the work per token stays.
- Workbench
- The chapter’s free-play bench: change the plan and see every result.
Step 1 of 2
Larkspur’s : 160 GB of memory, 40B weights at work per token. sets bytes per weight.
Fit both with the most weights.
671B total, 16-bit OVER BUDGET
| Budget | This plan |
|---|---|
| Memory (budget 160 GB) | 1342 GB |
| Work per token (budget 40B) | 37B active |
| Larkspur’s toy, beside it | 68,672 total, 43,328 active, 137,344 bytes |
Budgets are Larkspur’s planning numbers: 160 GB of GPU memory for weights (two 80 GB cards); at most 40B weights at work per word, to keep replies fast.
DeepSeek-V3’s report (2024) describes a mixture of experts with 671B total parameters, 37B activated for each token: 256 routed experts and 1 shared per layer, 8 routed chosen per token. arxiv.org · checked 2026-10-25